BOOK REVIEW
art

Biohazard
The Chilling True Story of the Largest Covert Biological Weapons Program in the World by the Man Who Ran It

[review] [excerpt] [endlinks] [purchase]

by Ken Alibek with Stephen Handelman
Random House, 1999

Reviewed by Dean Haycock

(Posted June 11, 1999 · Issue 56)


Review

For anyone with a passing interest in biological weapons research (including, perhaps, a significant percentage of potential victims), Ken Alibek's account of his career in bioweapons development, and of how he led others engaged in the same twisted scientific pursuit, will provide unexpected insights into this subdiscipline of military science. While reading the memoir, it is not difficult to imagine the surprise that academic experts in the field must have felt when they first learned the details of the Russian effort to win what they considered to be a biological weapons race.

The extraordinary extent of the Soviet government's commitment to research, produce, and deliver new and deadlier germs for use against its enemies might leave many readers wondering about the evidently complete disconnection between scientific insight and wisdom, between technical skill and humanity, that characterizes the field. Scientists such as Alibek (his Ph.D. is in microbiology) and his former colleagues were drawn into the death production labs because they were told - and they believed - that the United States was doing the same thing. As the Soviet Union broke down, Alibek's doubts about his work increased. He defected to the United States in 1992.

The line between biodefense and bio-offense becomes a convenient blur in the world that promotes pathogenicity and antibiotic resistance, rather than striving to overcome them. How can you prepare a defense against a deadly new strain of microbe if you don't have the deadly new strain to study? If you don't have firsthand knowledge of what it can do and how it could be used, how can you counter it? The only symbol of a difference between defense and offense in this field might be the large culture or fermentation vats that turn out tons of deadly microscopic weapons, ready to be processed and loaded into missiles, artillery shells, and airplanes.

Much of Alibek's career in the Soviet military was devoted to overseeing the large scale production of deadly germs, so they would be available when his government said they were needed. He earned a doctorate of science in biotechnology for developing a means to manufacture anthrax on an industrial scale. He was also involved in the development of new weapons; for his doctoral research, he investigated plague and tularemia as bacterial weapons. The symptoms of these two diseases can be similar. Both may involve fever, along with frequent swelling and suppuration of the lymph nodes that drain infection sites. And inhalation of infectious material produces pneumonic forms of both diseases.

Alibek's introduction to the science that turns the Hippocratic oath inside out came when he was a student at the Tomsk Medical Institute in 1973. Alibek's epidemiology instructor asked him to describe how the Soviets handled an unusual outbreak of tularemia, first among German troops and later Soviet civilians and soldiers, a short time before the Battle of Stalingrad in 1942. Alibek concluded that the outbreak was not natural. It was the only widespread outbreak of tularemia ever to occur in the Soviet Union. The number of cases jumped tenfold in one year, and then dropped to the usual 10,000 figure the next year. Seventy percent of the affected German invaders had the pneumonic form of the disease, a strong indication that the bacteria were purposefully disseminated.

Alibek was warned for his own good not to mention his conclusion ever again. In 1975, he was recruited into Biopreparat, the Soviet nationwide biotech/pharmaceutical/research program devoted to the clandestine discovery, development, and delivery of weapons of biological warfare. He served as Biopreparat's first deputy chief from 1988 until his defection.

What he did and learned during his time at Biopreparat often seems hard to believe, not because it is outlandish (although some scientists, he suggests, would say parts of it are unlikely), but because it is so scary to consider. The chapter entitled "Vector," for example, ends: "Our scientists had found it more difficult to cultivate Ebola than Marburg - they were not able to reach the necessary concentration - but by the end of 1990, the long-term problem of cultivation had been solved and we were close to developing a new Ebola weapon. Meanwhile, at Zagorsk (Sergiyev Posad) military scientists were putting the finishing touches on new Lassa fever and monkey pox biological weapons."

Had the book appeared during the cold war, skeptical (or savvy) readers might dismiss much of it as disinformation, intended by some right-wing group or intelligence agency to increase the Red Scare factor in order to serve their agenda. But the cold war is over. And Time columnist Stephen Handelman, former Moscow bureau chief of the Toronto Star, coauthored the book with Alibek. Alibek was interviewed on the BBC and Western biowarfare watchers have reacted publicly to his revelations.

Still, it may be difficult for those outside the world of bioweaponeers to fully absorb the scale of the Soviet effort. In 1990, Biopreparat controlled 40 facilities in 15 Soviet cities. Twelve or so were devoted exclusively to offensive work. The others combined military and civilian functions. In addition, other government departments, separate from Biopreparat, ranging from the Ministry of Defense to the Ministries of Health, Agriculture, and External Trade, devoted resources to the goal of developing usable bioweapons.

One particularly alarming section of Biohazard concerns smallpox. In 1958, the USSR delegation proposed at the World Health Organization Assembly that the international organization formally commit itself to eradicating the viral disease from the planet. The following year, mass vaccinations began. By 1976, smallpox was gone. Or at least many thought it was no longer a threat. The last two samples of smallpox were kept in the U.S. and in the USSR, the public was told. Scientists debated whether to destroy these remaining stocks, or to keep them for the genetic information they contained. Of course, the truth was that Biopreparat had plenty of smallpox virus. It was being developed as a potential weapon. After the virus was "conquered," the public was no longer vaccinated against it. Soldiers were no longer vaccinated against it. What competent biowarrior could resist including this germ in a state of the art arsenal?

Alibek tells of careers made by the successful genetic engineering of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, and of supervisors warning that such advances should not make Biopreparat scientists complacent. New antibiotics are being developed and new resistant strains will have to be produced to counter them. Aggressive biological warfare does not provide much chance to coast.

Biohazard contains a new, detailed account of "the worst single outbreak of inhalation anthrax on record this century." It occurred in 1979, when anthrax bacilli were released from the bioweapon lab at Sverdlosk. Long suspected in the West as a biological weapons accident, the Soviets officially attributed the unknown number of deaths (estimates range from 66 to 100) to "bad meat they bought from 'private butchers.'" Even Science magazine reported in 1988 that the details about the incident provided by three visiting Soviet officials "convinced some long-time doubters that the account [of bad meat] was true."

There is much more in this revealing book, including a four-page review of modern biological warfare, that could easily be expanded into another good book. For now, read Biohazard to remind yourself that nonfiction can be much more scary than fiction.

Dean Haycock is a journalist who writes science articles for many magazines and newspapers. He received his Ph.D. in neuroscience from Brown University.

Excerpt
Since leaving Moscow I have encountered an alarming level of ignorance about biological weapons. Some of the best scientists I've met in the West say it isn't possible to alter viruses genetically to make reliable weapons, or to store enough of a given pathogen for strategic purposes, or to deliver it in a way that assures maximum killing power. My knowledge and experience tell me that they are wrong. . . . There are some who maintain that discussing the subject will cause needless alarm. But existing defenses against these weapons are dangerously inadequate, and when biological terror strikes. . . .

You may purchase this book (365 pp, Hardcover) directly from:

Or purchase from another recommended location listed on our Web Bookstores page.



Tell us what you think.
PenFeedback

Endlinks

Germ Warfare Cited in Chinese Epidemics - Alibek also implicates China and Mikhail Gorbachev. Originally published in the New York Times.

Blueprint for Disaster: Russia's Move to Arm Dangerous States - what happens to the Russian military's aging inventory of dangerous, low cost weapons?

The Bioweaponeers - profile of Ken Alibek. From the March 2, 1998 issue of the New Yorker.

Chemical and Biological Warfare Online - HMS Beagle's overview of biological- and chemical-warfare-related sites on the Web.

Harvard Sussex Program on CBW Armament and Arms Limitation - seeks "to promote the global elimination of chemical and biological weapons and to strengthen the constraints against hostile uses of biomedical technologies."


Previous Book Review Articles
Unnatural Selection: The Promise and
the Power of Human Gene Research
by Lois Wingerson; reviewed by Jim Dawson
(Posted May 28, 1999 · Issue 55)
Advice for a Young Investigator and Advice to a Young Scientist
by Santiago Ramón y Cajal and Peter Medawar; reviewed by Tim Tokaryk
(Posted May 14, 1999 · Issue 54)
Egg and Ego: An Almost True Story of Life in the Biology Lab
by J.M.W. Slack; reviewed by Alan I. Packer
(Posted April 30, 1999 · Issue 53)
The Complete Dinosaur
edited by James O. Farlow and Michael K. Brett-Surman; reviewed by Alan I. Packer
(Posted April 16, 1999 · Issue 52)
Mr. Darwin's Shooter
by Roger MacDonald; reviewed by Tim Tokaryk
(Posted April 2, 1999 · Issue 51)
Rewinding Your Biological Clock: Motherhood Late in Life
by Richard J. Paulson, M.D., and Judith Sachs; reviewed by Jeanine Barone
(Posted March 19, 1999 · Issue 50)

more