by
Abstract
Memories of past Society for Neuroscience meetings reveal how the field has progressed during the "Decade of the Brain."
As we approach the end of the "Decade of the Brain," we can see the evolution of its study reflected in past meetings of the Society for Neuroscience. The meetings are all memorable, and not always for the science: the tail end of a hurricane in Miami, mild food poisoning in St. Louis, and a visit to Disney World in Anaheim are prominent memories. The science has been variable as well. To be honest, not all years have been as successful as others. Some are what I would describe as consolidation years, with no major news breaks, but lots of good work that builds on what has gone before.
Others are much more exciting. Nitric oxide burst onto the neuroscience
scene in a big way a few years ago, and research into Alzheimer's disease is
always a good bet for interesting results, not least because of the sheer
number of presentations.
Of particular interest are the advances that have been made in noninvasive imaging of human brain function. Originally developed as a technical tour de force, it is now combined with cutting-edge psychological know-how in a few centers, and it will probably result in exciting interpretations of the data in the future. As more people work on this new subdiscipline of neuroscience, contentious viewpoints develop, which is a good indication of the maturing field.
In the same time frame, the Society for Neuroscience itself has grown
dynamically - a reflection of the recognition that the subject is important,
not least in terms of funding. With a growing aging population, neurological
issues are altering government priorities, and an understanding of the basic
science underlying these neurological disorders is especially relevant now.
At the other end of the life cycle, the increasing relevance of developmental biology shows little sign of slowing down. This is allied to the advances made in molecular genetics and the Human (and other organisms) Genome Project. Future meetings promise exciting results from multilevel studies that look at interactions of genes, proteins, and other members of the complex signaling networks involved in the development of a fertilized egg to the adult and beyond.
A major change in this past decade is the advent of electronic publishing.
Especially in the past two or three years, almost every publisher has
developed or is developing electronic initiatives for disseminating their
pool of information. I think that this is an exciting time for science in
general, particularly as the possibility of offering readers additional data
sets in support of the key conclusions of papers is now a (relatively) easy
option.
I predict that future Society for Neuroscience meetings will include many more electronic presentations, including interactive posters. The use of video addenda to posters is already increasing noticeably. In my own area of publishing, review articles have definitely come of age.
New journals have not appeared to a great extent, but there are certainly
more reviews appearing in primary titles. This is a significant change and
reflects, I feel, the growing requirement for meaningful discussion and
synthesis of important fields for nonspecialists. Individuals' research
subjects are becoming more and more specialized, yet at the same time
everyone is required to be aware of significant developments within the
whole of neuroscience (and
beyond). Cross-disciplinary collaborations make it difficult, if
not impossible, to predict from where the next breakthrough might come for
one's own work. Reviews are therefore going to be needed more and more in
the coming years.
I see the next ten years as an exciting time for neuroscience. The annual meeting, even if it becomes almost totally unwieldy for a specialist, will become more and more relevant for individual researchers. The sheer breadth of material and number of attendees is almost a guarantee of the success of the "osmotic" mechanism for accumulating valuable information. Personal contact and interaction is also an imperative for success, and the meeting offers that in abundance.
And finally, the whole enterprise remains fun. Long may it continue to do so.
Gavin Swanson is editor of Trends in Neurosciences.
Andrzej Krauze is an illustrator, poster maker, cartoonist, and painter who illustrates regularly for HMS Beagle, The Guardian, The Sunday Telegraph, Bookseller, and New Statesman.


Endlinks
Neurosciences on the Internet - an extensive and searchable database of online resources. This site was reviewed in HMS Beagle.
The Whole Brain Atlas - a resource of normal and diseased brain images. Site includes a Neuroimaging Primer.
The Nitric Oxide Home Page - is both the home page of the NO Society and a clearinghouse of NO-related information.
The Alzheimer Research Forum - has online journal clubs and forums that provide discussion and debate on recent findings. Also reviewed in HMS Beagle.