CUTTING EDGE
Science Funding Debate Science Funding
A Site Map
of the Debate



(Posted June 26, 1998 · Issue 33) pdf download

Debate Documents
The Issue

Many U.S. baby-boomer scientists began their careers in research "gardens of plenty," due largely to the support of the federal government. Not so for the generation Xers, many of whom have received their training at a time of relatively reduced governmental support. Now, because of successful deficit reduction programs that have created a surplus of funds, the federal government is considering substantially increasing the budgets of agencies such as the National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation. But that same government is entertaining many other meritorious uses of the same funds, as well as possible tax cuts.

At this pivotal moment, many questions need to be considered: Is there are need for sizeable increases in funding for biological and medical research in the United States? If so, how should the money be apportioned among agencies? Is there redundancy among agencies? More fundamentally, are there inherent limitations that go along with a vast majority of research funds coming from governmental rather than private sources?

To discuss these questions, HMS Beagle hosted a moderated debate, "Science Funding at a Crossroads." Read the debate and you'll find that not all researchers are of a single mind about the relative merits and limitations of governmental support of research. You'll also learn about origins and evolution of government-supported research. Finally, you'll be given information about newly developing advocacy groups that facilitate exchanges of ideas and opinions between scientists and their elected officials.

Our Sponsor

Founded in 1986, Dynal has developed an extensive international sales and marketing organization consisting of subsidiaries, limited partnerships, and distributors. Dynal has achieved the leading position in biomagnetic separation. Dynal's focus is to provide the highest quality products and unsurpassed customer support. Since its inception, Dynal has been known to create products that enable scientists to achieve previously unattainable results. Dedicated to customer's needs, Dynal is organized in four specialized business units to service the different market segments. Dynal believes that product quality and performance, along with technical support, are keys to customer loyalty.

Andrzej Krauze is an illustrator, poster maker, cartoonist, and painter who illustrates regularly for HMS Beagle, The Guardian, The Sunday Telegraph, Bookseller, and New Statesman.

Previous Cutting Edge Debates
Medical Use of Marijuana
moderated by Rik Musty (Posted May 15, 1998 ·  Issue 30)
Career Changes in Science
moderated by Amy Fluet (Posted March 23, 1998 ·  Issue 27)
Model Systems
moderated by Jessica Bolker (Posted January 30, 1998 ·  Issue 24)
Neurodegenerative Diseases
moderated by Donald Price (Posted December 5, 1997 ·  Issue 21)
Shedding Light on Melatonin
moderated by Larry Morin (Posted October 17, 1997 ·  Issue 18)
The Origin of Life
moderated by Michael Meyer (Posted September 5, 1997 ·  Issue 15)
Optimum Mutation Rates in Evolution and Disease
moderated by Bryn Bridges (Posted July 25, 1997 ·  Issue 13)
Models of Immunologic Tolerance
moderated by Kenneth F. Schaffner (Posted June 27, 1997 ·  Issue 11)
Science and Ethics of Mammalian Cloning
moderated by Jon Gordon (Posted May 16, 1997 ·  Issue 8)
Making Sense of Antisense
moderated by C.A. Stein (Posted April 23, 1997 ·  Issue 6)
Academic Tenure: Is It Necessary?
moderated by William Tucker (Posted March 5, 1997 ·  Issue 4)
Do Orphan Receptors Have Ligands?
moderated by Mitch Lazar (Posted February 20, 1997  ·  Issue 2)
The Origin and Evolution of Introns
moderated by Russ Doolittle (Posted February 1, 1997 ·  Issue 1)